The legal system and politicians are still casting about looking for a way to understand the place the Internet will play in society, and our collective responsibilities while using it. The decisions they make may be profound, profane, or both. My posts are observations only, not legal advice. Under the ethics rules of the Bar of the State of New Mexico, these posts are a "Lawyer Advertisement." Please let me know if it is successful advertising.

Wednesday, September 21, 2005

Contracts – Illinois Court Upholds Validity of Click Wrap Contract

In the latest of a long string of cases upholding the validity of click wrap contracts, the Illinois Appellate Court has held that the hyperlinked “Terms and Conditions” on Dell’s website is a binding contract – in spite of the fact that purchasers were not required to check an “I agree” indicate their assent in a similar way. The Court made two important observations. The first is that the fact that the plaintiffs were making purchases on-line indicated that they were sophisticated consumers who were aware of the Internet practice of linking contract terms via hyperlink, and indicating assent by purchase. The second is that the Court likened the hyperlink to turning a page in a contract – analogizing that the entire order process was a contract, and the terms and conditions a page in that contract. This case is important for Internet businesses since it provides additional support for arguments upholding the validity of click wrap contracts without an “I agree” checkbox or button. Hubbert v. Dell

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home