The legal system and politicians are still casting about looking for a way to understand the place the Internet will play in society, and our collective responsibilities while using it. The decisions they make may be profound, profane, or both. My posts are observations only, not legal advice. Under the ethics rules of the Bar of the State of New Mexico, these posts are a "Lawyer Advertisement." Please let me know if it is successful advertising.

Friday, August 26, 2005

Trademarks – Decision Entered in Geico v. Google dispute

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, held that Google’s sale of the trademark “Geico” as a search term does not broadly violate Geico’s trademark interest. However, Google’s use of the trademark “Geico” in the sponsored ads (i.e. “get rates cheaper than Geico by clicking here”) does. While its difficult to extrapolate the meaning of this decision beyond the search engine sector, it does provide some breaching room to other Internet companies who face frequent claims of third party trademark infringement based on content that they either transmit or host.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home