The legal system and politicians are still casting about looking for a way to understand the place the Internet will play in society, and our collective responsibilities while using it. The decisions they make may be profound, profane, or both. My posts are observations only, not legal advice. Under the ethics rules of the Bar of the State of New Mexico, these posts are a "Lawyer Advertisement." Please let me know if it is successful advertising.

Wednesday, January 18, 2006

SPAM – Private Entities May Block CAN-SPAM Compliant E-mail

The Supreme Court let stand a lower court decision that the CAN-SPAM Act did not pre-empt more restrictive private anti-spam rules. As noted in an earlier post, the plaintiff made two arguments. First that CAN-SPAM created a standard that private entities were required to honor. Second that the University of Texas infringed free speech rights by blocking legitimate e-mail. Both arguments were rejected. The Supreme Court’s decision solidifies the general understanding among Internet infrastructure providers that they may implement e-mail policies that differ from the CAN-SPAM Act. ecommerce times article

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home